Here is the association table of sample names and conditions, colored with respect to condition color used in figures.

File.names Conditions
SCV031 0 µM 2'-C-meA
SCV032 50 µM 2'-C-meA

The Aim of Distriburion Analysis

This part of document includes figures representing the distribution of labels associated with samples. Can give idea about percentage distributions of classes (like: “no signal”, “infection”, “infection&lysis”) and distribution of problematic samples (like: “dirt”, “dried out”, “multiple infections”)

Distibutions

Here once more the figures side by side

Distribution of DDOM

The Aim of Single Variable Analysis

This part of document includes single variable figures associated with samples. We focus on 5 parameters: maximum, shape, midpoint, infection time, start point. For all parameters we investigate either the entire set of infections (i.e both “infection” and “infection & lysis”), or we only investigate the “infection & lysis” cases.

For each figure we include tables showing p-values from t.test, Mann-Whitney U Test (wilcox.test), ,ean differences between conditions and the effect size. The tables also show the sample size for each condition.

Maximum

ttest. adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.00000 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.00000 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Diffrence between means

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.47175 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.47175 0.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 3.295e-01 2.874e-01 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 2.874e-01 2.429e-01 173
numSamples 154 173

ttest. adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Diffrence between means

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.57131 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.57131 0.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 3.891e-01 3.317e-01 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 3.317e-01 2.740e-01 143
numSamples 109 143

ttest. adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.04077 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.04077 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.11652 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.11652 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Diffrence between means

Maximum Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.34666 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.34666 0.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Maximum Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 5.376e-01 5.190e-01 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 5.190e-01 4.610e-01 30
numSamples 45 30

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of maximums

Slope

ttest. adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.00144 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00144 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.01746 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.01746 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Diffrence between means

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.24169 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.24169 0.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 3.156e-01 2.421e-01 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 2.421e-01 1.477e-01 173
numSamples 154 173

ttest. adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.00054 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00054 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.00105 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00105 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Diffrence between means

Slope Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.33586 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.33586 0.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Slope Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 4.148e-01 3.033e-01 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 3.033e-01 1.677e-01 143
numSamples 109 143

ttest. adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.28434 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.28434 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.59256 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.59256 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Diffrence between means

Slope Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.11371 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.11371 0.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Slope Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 2.716e-01 2.562e-01 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 2.562e-01 2.160e-01 30
numSamples 45 30

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of slopes

Midpoint

ttest. adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.19380 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.19380 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.27828 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.27828 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Diffrence between means

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.53229 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.53229 0.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.135e+00 1.033e+00 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.033e+00 9.301e-01 173
numSamples 154 173

ttest. adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Diffrence between means

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.03533 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.03533 0.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 8.752e-01 9.037e-01 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 9.037e-01 9.106e-01 143
numSamples 109 143

ttest. adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.45405 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.45405 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.45813 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.45813 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Diffrence between means

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 1.16599 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.16599 0.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 2.867e+00 2.984e+00 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 2.984e+00 3.007e+00 30
numSamples 45 30

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of midpoints

Infection Time

ttest. adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Diffrence between means

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.18663 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.18663 0.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 8.627e-01 8.570e-01 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 8.570e-01 8.492e-01 173
numSamples 154 173

ttest. adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Diffrence between means

infection time Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.07899 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.07899 0.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

infection time Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 8.715e-01 8.814e-01 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 8.814e-01 8.748e-01 143
numSamples 109 143

ttest. adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Diffrence between means

infection time Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.16310 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.16310 0.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

infection time Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.935e+00 2.131e+00 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 2.131e+00 2.301e+00 30
numSamples 45 30

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of infection time

Start point

ttest. adjusted p values

Start point (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.35868 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.35868 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Start point (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.75024 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.75024 1.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

Diffrence between means

Start point (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.43897 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.43897 0.00000 173
numSamples 154 173

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Start point (inf + infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.133e+00 1.011e+00 154
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.011e+00 8.858e-01 173
numSamples 154 173

ttest. adjusted p values

start point Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

start point Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 1.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

Diffrence between means

start point Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 0.00416 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00416 0.00000 143
numSamples 109 143

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

start point Distribution (infLys)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 9.119e-01 8.698e-01 109
50 µM 2’-C-meA 8.698e-01 8.218e-01 143
numSamples 109 143

ttest. adjusted p values

start point Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.46254 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.46254 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

start point Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 1.00000 0.27192 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 0.27192 1.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

Diffrence between means

start point Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 0.00000 1.24754 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 1.24754 0.00000 30
numSamples 45 30

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

start point Distribution (inf)

0 µM 2’-C-meA 50 µM 2’-C-meA numSamples
0 µM 2’-C-meA 2.992e+00 3.195e+00 45
50 µM 2’-C-meA 3.195e+00 3.329e+00 30
numSamples 45 30

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of start point

The Aim

This document includes double variable figures associated with samples. For all parameters we investigate either the entire set of infections (i.e both “infection” and “infection & lysis”), or we only investigate the “infection & lysis” cases. For each graph we plot density and point versions.

The investigated parameter couples are

1.) Midpoint vs Slope 2.) Slope vs Maximum 3.) Midpoint vs Maximum

Midpoint vs Slope

Slope vs Maximum

Midpoint vs Maximum